Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts

Monday, June 17, 2024

Geopoetics: Bodies and Landscapes




‘Geopoetics’ encompasses a range of creative approaches to geography, including fiction, non-fiction, poetry, geophilosophy, as well as visual and performance arts. Eric Magrane explains that a geopoetic approach focuses on “embodied engagements with place”, and demonstrates awareness of “cultural constructions of […] place, space, landscape”, practicing “a relational perspective to human–environment interactions [my italics].”[1]

In preparation for writing my MA dissertation, I looked for examples of geopoetic writing that expressed embodied empathy with landscapes. Interestingly, although perhaps not surprisingly, my research repeatedly led me to works by disabled and chronically ill writers.



In her poetry collection, ‘The Girl Who Forgets How to Walk’, Kate Davis explores the geography of south Cumbria, alongside her experiences of disability. Through finding synchronicities between local geology and her own body, Davis creates intriguing juxtapositions and fresh poetic frames for both things.

For example, in ‘Boulder Drift’, Davis compares two different names given to glacial rocks, and relates the qualities inferred in each name to different states of her body:

The men who mined here called it Pinel….
…the hint of fixing in place,
pinned on display like an insect.
She would have preferred the one
geologists gave it – Boulder Drift.
To imagine those stones suspended,
all weight gone, their pock-marked bodies
lifted and held like dancers.[2]

Through a geopoetic exploration of language, Davis reshapes how we view both the landscape and her disabled body. Boulders and disabled bodies, though usually thought of as being heavy and pinned in place, instead become beautiful, drifting dancers.

Emily Hasler produces a similar effect of embodied geological empathy in her poetry collection, ‘Local Interest.’ Here Hasler explores the history and geography of the Stour river estuary, an area just north of the Naze and Hamford Water. The poem ‘At Cobbold Point’ in particular taps into an embodied sense of emplacement, describing Hasler’s experience of swimming near a breakwater constructed from “imported Norwegian rocks which pin the shore / in place.”[3] Hasler describes the breakwater “like a curved spine/my curved spine / breaking the water.” Through using recurring verbs that relate to both her own body and the movements of silt around the pinned shoreline – moving, accreting, eroding, thinking, coasting – Hasler builds a cycle of mirroring resonances that connect her intrinsically to her environment:

I am accreting thoughts… The coast, for the most part, is thinking… Coast is what I swim, what I think, moving in more than one direction.

These poetry collections helped me feel into how I might be able to articulate commonalities between my own body and local landscape - the eroding coast at Walton-on-the-Naze and the flooding of its adjoining backwaters, Hamford Water. 

In both the essays and poems of ‘Inundation’, I sought out verbs to describe shared experiences between me and the coast. At the end of the essay, ‘Erosion’, for example, I realise my own ‘verb-nature’ through reflecting on the ever-changing physical forms of the eroding cliff. The title of the poem ‘Nazing’ is itself a verbing of the landscape – my attempt to express the emotional and physiological effects that spending time at the Naze was having. By referring to my body as becoming more like the Naze – that it was nazing – I am conveying the healing effect of imagining my body becoming yielding like the cliffs, rather than hard with tension like the seawall.

Further inspired by Davis and Hasler, I also experimented with using historical and geological information to form poems. For example, Davis forms a poem from a geological quarter sheet from 1873, even naming the poem ‘Explanation of quarter sheet 91 N.W.’ In a similar vein, my poem ‘Tidal Refrains’ uses excerpts from Hilda Grieve’s The Great Tide: The Story of the 1953 Flood Disaster in Essex to collate a brief overview of the history of flooding on the Essex coastline, as well as peoples cyclical surprise at each flooding event.  With this poem, my aim was to highlight what geologist, Marcia Bjornerud refers to as our “temporal illiteracy”[4]: while reading Grieve’s account of Essex seawall construction, I was struck by the repetitious comments about the height of the flood tides; there seemed to be no significant ancestral or cultural knowledge about the flood-prone nature of the coastal regions, and rather than accepting the nature of these places, landowners simply put more effort into dominating them, building higher and stronger seawalls. As Bjornerud argues, “we accelerate into landscapes and ecosystems with no sense of their long-established traffic patterns, and then react with surprise and indignation when we face the penalties for ignoring natural laws.” 

Now, as we face our uncertain future in the Anthropocene, it is more important than ever to recognise, respect, and attune to environmental patterns. As writers and artists, taking a geopoetic approach seems a wonderful way of developing and promoting this awareness of the landscapes we shape, and are shaped by.


~~~~


My collection of essays and poems, Inundation is now available in paperback and ebook.



[1] Eric Magrane, “Climate Geopoetics (the earth is a composted poem),” Dialogues in Human Geography 11, no. 1 (2021): 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620908390

[3] Emily Hasler, “At Cobbold Point” in Local Interest (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2023), 8.

[4]Marcia Bjornerud, Timefulness: How Thinking Like a Geologist Can Help Save the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018), 7.

Thursday, November 9, 2023

Does AI Pose a Threat to Writers?



Does AI pose a threat to writers? Stupid people misusing AI definitely do.


I’m not a natural techie at all. In fact, contrary to popular misconceptions about autistic people, I’m actually fairly averse to new technology. I’ve only recently started using a Bluetooth speaker, for example. So, my recently developing interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has come as a bit of a surprise to me.

Colourful psychedelic picture of a robot writing at a desk
AI generated image


Since finishing my master’s degree, I’ve been looking for ways to earn money online, and during my searching I came across YouTube videos of people claiming that they had made money by using AI to write ebooks. Feeling intrigued, I started experimenting with Chat GPT to see what it was capable of.

My first impression was that the writing it produced was much better than I’d expected, and I started thinking, oh dear, this doesn’t bode well for us writers. On closer inspection though, I relaxed. AI writing is repetitive and rather bland, and furthermore, it can ‘hallucinate’ facts and sources of information. For example, I asked Chat GPT to give me a reading list of books about British saltmarshes, and from the list of book titles and authors it presented, only one actually exists – the others were completely made up.

Still, I came away from my experiments feeling that AI could be a useful tool for writers. It can prompt ideas. For example, it can break down a book idea into possible chapter headings, and it can answer some kinds of questions more easily than a straightforward search engine, providing that you take any ‘facts’ it gives you with a pinch of salt. I certainly wasn’t concerned at that point that AI posed any real threat to professional writers.

However, as I searched more for online writing jobs, I started coming across some troubling Reddit threads. Many freelance content writers were noticing the same thing – it’s becoming harder and harder to find writing gigs online. This reflected my own experience - I used to work as an online content writer around ten years ago, but things definitely seem different today. The opportunities seem fewer and farther between. Not only this, but a strange new phenomenon is beginning.

Writing clients are starting to use ‘AI detectors’ – software designed to identify text written by AI. The problem is, these detectors are flagging up writing that was most definitely written by humans. One writer described how they’d been working for a particular client for ten years, yet recently the client had started using an AI detector. The detector started flagging up writing from multiple writers on the team, and when those writers said that they hadn’t used AI, rather than believing them, the client doubled down and continued to accuse them. Subsequently, many of those writers are now leaving.

This seems so ridiculously stupid to me. But given how much faith some people invest in technology, I can well believe it’s true. You’d think that having worked with people for years, you would 1) trust them more, and 2) recognise whether there had been a change in the quality of their writing. Obviously, when they started writing for you years ago they would not have been using AI then, so unless there’s been a deterioration in quality, there’d be no reason to trust the AI detector over them.

I don’t really know anything about AI detectors or how they work, but simply on an intuitive level it seems untrustworthy. After all, AI has learnt how to write from humans, so to then try and judge whether human writing sounds like AI writing seems like an oxymoron, surely?

I decided to test a free AI detector using a couple of paragraphs from this blog post. This was the result (LOL!)

Hmph!


You might be thinking, oh well, this seems more of a problem for content writers, not creative writers. Yet, I'm already noticing that magazines and journals are starting to stipulate in their submission guidelines that they won't accept AI generated or assisted work. Now, how are they determining whether a piece of creative work has been assisted by AI? Will creative journals also turn to AI detectors?

Anyway, the conclusion I take away from all this is that the main threat posed by AI is not the AI itself. AI can be useful when used properly, and I would say that text generators like Chat GPT could be particularly useful for people with communication disabilities. Like any technology, the real risks develop in relation to how people use it. The dangers of AI come from people abdicating their responsibility to practice their own intelligence and engage their thinking skills, instead relying on AI to think for them. After all, AI detectors are themselves AI, right?

It seems too many people are focussing on the ‘I’ in AI, rather than on the ‘A’.

Have you used AI creatively? Have you ever run into any AI-related problems? Let me know in the comments, I'm very interested to know!